Youth transfer fees are basically assets traded for
youth soccer players in professional affiliated development teams
between those professional teams. If a professional team invests in the
youth’s future career, there is perceived value if that developed
player is traded to another professional development club. It’s
basically like contracts for youth careers. If your player is doing
well but another club wants to recruit them based on their potential,
you would be reimbursed for your investment.
On one side it makes
sense, because there is a lot of money being invested in some of these
programs. For example: lodging, traveling, promotion, etc. Shouldn’t a
club be paid back in some sense for their dedication to that player?
They did provided the resources that helped mold the players into
budding stars.
On the other side, is it right to be involved with this
type of management in a youth’s career? Shouldn’t youth soccer be a fun
environment, free of this type of baggage? Whether you’re running a rec
league or a select, isn’t it up to the kids how much they push
themselves? There is lurking suspicion of these players not being in
full control of their development.
We found an article advocating that
it’s time for the US to get on board considering the positive direction
the MLS is heading (read the article here). Take a minute to go through
it and decide for yourself. Either way you choose it brings up good
points on whether the US is ready or willing to take that step.
Leave
your thoughts below.
~Sam@bluesombrero.com



Absolutely not! The parents are the ones doing the investing.
Posted by: Kim Williams | October 02, 2009 at 12:03 PM
From my perspective it is the players parents that need to be paid. Although the club is essential in helping develop a player it is ultimately the parents who invested their $$ to help finance the club (through coaches fees, sign up fees etc.) during their son or daughters developmental years.
Posted by: docguru | October 02, 2009 at 01:02 PM